TLDR
South Korea is moving toward a new stablecoin law that tightens rules for issuers while dropping a controversial plan to restrict crypto exchange ownership.
- Lawmaker Kim Sang-hoon is pushing the second phase of the Digital Asset Basic Act, with a focus on reserve-backed stablecoins and investor protection.
- Earlier ideas to cap or limit crypto exchange ownership have been removed, reducing direct regulatory pressure on major Korean exchanges.
- Key open questions are timing, how KRW versus dollar stablecoins are treated, and whether exchange-related rules resurface in later drafts.
Deep Dive
1. What The New Stablecoin Push Actually Covers
Kim Sang-hoon, who chairs the ruling partys special committee on digital assets, is pushing to accelerate the second phase of South Koreas Digital Asset Basic Act, first proposed in 2022.
According to a recent policy summary, the new phase aims to set rules for stablecoins pegged to currencies like the Korean won and US dollar, focusing on reserve requirements, transparency, consumer protection, and links to the traditional financial system. The effort explicitly references global frameworks such as the EUs MiCA and Japans revised Payment Services Act as reference points for issuer-focused regulation.
If enacted, this framework could arrive around 2025, though that depends on political consensus and detailed technical work on the bill.
Korea is trying to land in the regulated but open bucket for stablecoins, similar to Europe and Japan, instead of staying in a gray zone.
2. How Sparing Exchanges Changes The Picture
Earlier drafts had floated restrictions on crypto exchange ownership aimed at reducing conflicts of interest and market manipulation risk. Kims latest push explicitly drops these exchange-ownership limits, a move welcomed by major Korean exchanges.
Removing those provisions lowers the near term risk of forced structural changes at large venues and preserves competition for local market share. For users and token projects, that typically means less disruption to liquidity, listings, and trading depth on core Korean platforms.
The regulatory focus is shifting from exchanges themselves to the stablecoins they list, which is friendlier to trading venues but still tightens the rules around the assets.
3. What To Watch Next For Crypto Users
The big unknowns are timing and scope. The Digital Asset Basic Act still needs political agreement, and details could shift as committees negotiate. Exchange-related ideas could be revived later if there are scandals or market issues.
Stablecoin specifics will matter: how strict reserve rules are, whether foreign dollar stablecoins get treated differently from KRW stablecoins, and what disclosure is required. Closer alignment with MiCA-style rules would likely make institutions more comfortable using regulated stablecoins in Korea, potentially boosting volumes.
For traders and builders, the key signals are draft texts on stablecoin reserves and any renewed talk of exchange limits, since those will determine how investable and liquid the Korean market feels.
Conclusion
South Korea is narrowing its crypto reform agenda toward stablecoin issuers instead of reshaping exchange ownership, which reduces immediate venue risk while raising the bar for compliant stablecoins. If the Digital Asset Basic Acts second phase lands close to MiCA and Japans model, it could unlock more institutional participation in Korean crypto markets, but the final impact depends on how strict the stablecoin rules and timelines turn out to be.
CoinsKid.Com