Need help? Support
BITCOIN
Tether Dominance USDT.D

Giancarlo says banks need crypto rules

Published 464 words 3 min read

TLDR

Former CFTC chair Chris Giancarlo argues that big banks need clear crypto rules more urgently than crypto startups do.

  1. Giancarlo says US banks will not invest billions in blockchain and stablecoin payment rails without regulatory clarity from the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.
  2. He argues crypto firms can keep building in gray areas, but banks are constrained by compliance, risking US banks falling behind European and Asian competitors.
  3. The key hinge is whether Congress passes the CLARITY Act or leaves regulators to improvise, which would slow bank adoption and keep US crypto market structure fragmented.

Deep Dive

1. Giancarlos Core Argument

On Scott Melkers podcast, former CFTC chair Chris Giancarlo said banks cannot afford regulatory uncertainty and need clear crypto rules before committing large infrastructure spend.

He pointed to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a market structure bill that passed the House in 2025 and now sits with the Senate Banking Committee, as the main vehicle to provide that certainty for banks and stablecoin markets.

Giancarlo estimates the bill has about a 60 to 40 chance of passing and stresses that it would finally clarify which assets and activities sit under the SEC versus the CFTC, giving banks a defined rulebook to follow.

2. Why Banks Feel More Stuck Than Crypto

Giancarlos key distinction is that crypto companies have already shown they will keep building products in hostile or ambiguous environments, whereas banks are bound by risk and compliance officers.

General counsels at large banks are telling boards they cannot invest billions of dollars into blockchain-based payment rails or stablecoin infrastructure without a clear, durable framework, especially around issues like whether stablecoin issuers can pay yield to holders.

He warns that if the United States drags its feet, European and Asian banks will build out digital rails first, leaving US banks operating on analogue, message-based systems while global payment flows migrate elsewhere.

3. What To Watch Next

Giancarlo says if Congress fails to pass the CLARITY Act, he expects SEC and CFTC leaders to draft interim rules, but those would be patchy and easier to reverse than legislation.

The bill itself is stalled over how far to let crypto firms pay rewards on stablecoins, with banks lobbying for a level playing field and some crypto companies opposing caps, which keeps institutional adoption in limbo.

What this means

For crypto users, the main signal is not whether crypto startups can keep building, but when large banks get enough legal comfort to commit to on-chain payment and settlement at scale.

Conclusion

Giancarlos view is that crypto innovation will continue regardless, but the next big leg of adoption depends on banks getting clear, durable rules for digital assets. The fate of the CLARITY Act and any stopgap rulemaking will shape how quickly US banks join on-chain payments and whether leadership in crypto finance tilts toward other regions.

Educational information only. Crypto markets are volatile and this is not financial advice.


Top