Need help? Support
BITCOIN
Tether Dominance USDT.D

Which regulators changed crypto rules?

Published 453 words 3 min read

TLDR

In the past week, three regulators moved meaningfully on crypto rules: Hong Kongs SFC/FSTB broadened licensing for dealers and custodians, Lithuania enforced EU MiCA licensing, and the U.S. Federal Reserve reversed a 2023 bank?crypto restriction.

  1. Hong Kong (SFC/FSTB): New licensing regimes for dealers and custodians were announced, tightening oversight and standards (statement coverage).
  2. Lithuania (Bank of Lithuania): MiCA licenses are required by Dec 31, with unlicensed firms illegal from Jan 1, 2026 (regulator notice summary).
  3. United States (Federal Reserve): Rescinded 2023 policy; uninsured state member banks can seek crypto activity approvals case?by?case (policy change).

Deep Dive

1. Hong Kong Licensing Expansion

Hong Kong advanced new licensing regimes for virtual asset dealers and custodians to complement existing exchange and stablecoin rules. The plans aim to introduce bill text in 2026 and model dealer standards on Type 1 securities requirements, with explicit custodial key?management obligations (statement coverage).

  • Regulators emphasize same business, same risks, same rules, bringing advisory and asset management into scope next.
  • The goal is institutional trust: asset protection, operational risk controls, and investor safeguards under a unified framework (follow?up analysis).
What this means

If you serve Hong Kong clients, expect licensing for dealing and custody plus tighter operational standards. Early engagement with regulators can smooth applications.

2. Lithuania Enforces EU MiCA

Lithuania set a hard MiCA compliance line: from Jan 1, 2026, operating without MiCA approval is illegal. Non?compliance may trigger fines, site blocking, shutdowns, and criminal liability for executives (regulator notice summary).

  • MiCA harmonizes licensing, governance, capital, and consumer protections across the EU, shifting national oversight to licensed entities.
  • With low application rates so far, service exits are likely, but licensed firms should provide stronger protections (additional context).
What this means

EU?facing firms must secure MiCA licenses or wind down. Users should migrate to licensed platforms or self?custody before cutoffs to avoid disruptions.

3. U.S. Federal Reserve Policy Shift

The Federal Reserve rescinded its 2023 guidance that discouraged crypto activities at uninsured state member banks, adopting case?by?case approvals under a risk?based framework (policy change).

  • Supporters argue it modernizes banking while maintaining safety and soundness; critics warn about uneven practices and stability risks.
  • This complements broader U.S. momentum toward clearer federal rules, even as other agencies and Congress debate market structure and stablecoin standards (roundup context).
What this means

Banks can propose crypto services with tailored risk controls. If approvals accelerate, expect more regulated on?ramps, custody, and payment integrations.

Conclusion

Regulators are converging on clearer, license?based frameworks: Hong Kong is tightening across the value chain, the EU (via Lithuania) is enforcing MiCA, and the U.S. Fed opened a path for bank?crypto activity under supervision. For operators, the direction is compliance and institutional?grade controls; for users, expect fewer unlicensed options but stronger protections.

Educational information only. Crypto markets are volatile and this is not financial advice.


Top