TLDR
South Koreas stablecoin bill stalled because regulators are split on who can issue and supervise won?pegged stablecoins, creating a deadlock between the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea that pushed the bill into 2026 %%CKPROTECTED0%%.
- The central bank wants only bank?controlled consortia (at least 51% bank ownership) to issue stablecoins, which the markets regulator opposes policy summary.
- They also disagree on creating a new licensing committee and on who enforces reserve and supervision rules analysis.
- Investor protections are largely agreed, including 100% bank?custodied reserves and no?fault liability, but the oversight dispute blocked submission until 2026 %%CKPROTECTED0%%.
Deep Dive
1. Issuer Control Fight
The central bank argues only bank?majority consortia should issue won stablecoins to protect monetary stability, while the markets regulator warns this would exclude tech firms and suppress innovation. The 51% bank?ownership threshold is central to the Bank of Koreas position, and it is the main sticking point noted by multiple reports policy summary.
If a banks?only model wins, competition and product variety could narrow near term; a broader issuer field could speed innovation but raises supervisory demands.
2. Supervision and Governance
Beyond issuers, the agencies disagree on who controls reserve requirements, supervision, and enforcement. The central bank favors a new licensing or approvals committee, while the financial regulator prefers to work within existing authority and coordination mechanisms, which has complicated the bills structure and timing analysis.
Without a clear lead agency and process for approvals and audits, lawmakers chose to delay rather than pass a framework with unresolved oversight gaps.
3. Investor Protections Agreed
Substantive consumer safeguards are not the issue. Draft provisions require stablecoin issuers to hold fully segregated reserves in bank deposits or government bonds with licensed custodians, and to accept stricter operator liability standards similar to online retail. These elements appear settled, but the issuer and oversight disputes keep the package on hold until 2026 %%CKPROTECTED0%%.
The contours of a strict, bank?custodied reserve regime are in place. Execution waits on a governance deal, so firms may pause launches or look to clearer jurisdictions meanwhile.
Conclusion
The stall is not about whether to regulate stablecoins, but about who gets to issue them and who polices reserves and compliance. Once Koreas central bank and markets regulator align on issuer eligibility and a licensing?oversight process, the law can move. Until then, expect continued uncertainty for domestic stablecoin projects and slower rollout of won?linked products.
CoinsKid.Com