TLDR
The SEC has proposed new rules for how investment advisers and funds can hold crypto, tightening safeguards while opening more clearly defined routes for compliant custody.
- The proposal creates a detailed crypto custody framework for advisers and regulated funds, covering qualified custodians, state trust companies and tightly controlled direct custody.
- It adds operational requirements such as segregation of client assets, multi?person approvals, cyber reviews and explicit handling of staking, forks and airdrops.
- The rules are not final yet, with a 60 day comment period, so requirements and timelines could change before anything binds the market.
Deep Dive
1. What The SEC Proposed
According to a recent custody framework proposal for advisers and funds, the SEC wants a specific regime for crypto custody by registered investment advisers and regulated funds.
The framework allows three paths: using a traditional qualified custodian, using a vetted state?chartered trust company, or, only when no external provider can support a given asset, letting the adviser or fund hold crypto directly under strict conditions.
A separate legal overview notes that this proposal would explicitly allow state trust companies to safeguard client crypto and let advisers and funds hold it themselves under defined conditions, filling a gap in existing guidance for institutions that want onchain exposure while staying within securities law constraints.
2. New Safeguards And Operational Rules
For direct custody, advisers would need written evidence that no qualified custodian can support the asset and must reassess that at least quarterly. Each transaction would require authorization from at least two people, and client assets would sit in separate blockchain addresses.
Controls include annual cybersecurity reviews, quarterly client statements and an independent public accountants internal control report within six months of starting direct custody, plus ongoing fund?board review of why an outside custodian is unavailable.
State?chartered trust companies could act as custodians only after specialized due diligence, including checks on authorization, audited financials, internal control reports and clear policies for how staking, forks, airdrops and network migrations are handled, with client assets segregated from firm assets.
If you access crypto through advisers, funds or tokenized products, you are likely to see more institutional?style controls and disclosures, but also a higher bar that could favor larger custodians and well?capitalized trust companies.
3. What To Watch Next
The SEC plans to add crypto custody information to Forms ADV and N?CEN, which should make it easier over time to see which advisers and funds are using which custody models and controls.
The proposal is out for a 60 day public comment period after Federal Register publication, and final rules may differ, so the next concrete signal will be the SECs adopting release that locks in any new requirements and compliance dates.
For crypto users, the practical watchpoints are whether your existing fund or adviser changes its disclosed custodian, restricts certain tokens because no qualified custodian can support them, or adjusts policies around staking and airdrops.
Conclusion
The SECs new crypto custody proposal aims to make institutional handling of digital assets more predictable by defining acceptable custodians and minimum safeguards, not by banning adviser or fund involvement.
If it moves forward in something like its current form, expect more formalized, disclosure?heavy custody arrangements that could make institutional crypto access safer, while also increasing compliance complexity and potentially narrowing the list of assets that regulated managers are willing to hold.
CoinsKid.Com