TLDR
Over 50,000 people in Europe have formally asked the European Commission to relax MiCAs strict ban on rewards for regulated stablecoins.
- A Stand With Crypto EU campaign sent over 50,000 letters and a 126,000?signature petition urging the EU to allow stablecoin cashback, loyalty perks and fee discounts.
- MiCA currently bans interest on stablecoins, and EU central banks want that ban extended to indirect rewards and yield services, even as they propose softening rigid reserve rules.
- The Commissions MiCA review now weighs user demands against stability concerns, and its eventual decision could reshape euro stablecoin adoption and EU competitiveness against dollar stablecoins.
Deep Dive
1. What Users Are Asking For
Advocacy group Stand With Crypto EU says more than 50,000 Europeans emailed the European Commission during its MiCA review consultation, calling for regulated stablecoin providers to offer rewards such as cashback, loyalty benefits and lower fees for users, under clear rules rather than a blanket ban.
A separate petition has over 126,000 signatures pushing for wider changes, including lifting MiCAs explicit ban on passing through yield when stablecoins are backed by safe, interest?bearing assets, arguing that users should not receive fewer benefits than with bank accounts or other e?money products. Coverage of the campaign highlights that it generated far more responses than earlier consultations on the digital euro and crypto rules, signaling unusually strong retail engagement.
There is real, organized user pressure in the EU to make regulated stablecoins feel more like modern payment products rather than bare, no?reward balances.
2. How MiCA Treats Rewards And Yield Today
MiCA classifies single?currency stablecoins as e?money tokens and explicitly prohibits issuers and crypto service providers from paying interest on them, which has already forced some reward programs in the EU to shut down. EU central banks, via the European System of Central Banks, have urged the Commission to keep this ban and extend it to indirect incentives, including rewards, fee reductions, loyalty schemes and yield?generating lending, borrowing or staking arrangements.
Their rationale is that electronic money should be used for payments, not saving, and that deposit?like rewards could pull funding away from banks and weaken monetary policy transmission. At the same time, central banks and issuers like Circle are asking to replace MiCAs rigid requirements that 30 to 60 percent of reserves sit in bank deposits with more flexible liquidity?based rules, to reduce bank credit risk and better match always?on stablecoin redemptions with reserve asset availability.
Regulators are open to technical changes on reserves but remain cautious about anything that makes stablecoins look like interest?bearing savings products.
3. Why It Matters For Euro Stablecoins And What To Watch
Stand With Crypto and industry submissions argue that rewards, within a regulated framework, could help euro?denominated stablecoins compete with dominant dollar tokens and support EU payment sovereignty, especially if Europe wants to match the United States moves to use stablecoins as a settlement layer. If MiCA continues to block both interest and most reward structures, more European users and projects may rely on offshore or non?MiCA stablecoins, reducing the blocs influence over standards.
The MiCA review consultation closed at the end of September 2026, and the Commission will now assess feedback and decide whether to propose amendments, with broader crypto rule revisions expected around 2027. Key signals to watch are any Commission communication on stablecoin rewards, changes to the interest bans scope, and whether reserve rules shift toward liquidity tests rather than fixed deposit floors.
For EU stablecoin users and builders, the next phase of MiCA will determine whether regulated euro tokens can offer competitive perks, or whether those features remain largely a dollar?stablecoin advantage.
Conclusion
EU stablecoin users are pushing hard to make regulated tokens more attractive through rewards, while central banks focus on protecting bank funding and keeping stablecoins squarely in the payments lane.
The Commissions MiCA review sits between these forces, and its eventual choices on rewards and reserve design will shape whether euro?denominated stablecoins become a serious, user?friendly alternative to dollar stablecoins or stay constrained by prudential concerns.
