TLDR
Polands parliament has again failed to override President Karol Nawrockis veto of a crypto oversight bill, leaving the country without a clear regulator for its digital asset market.
- The Sejm fell 25 votes short of the three-fifths majority needed to overturn the veto, marking the presidents third successful block of the same legislation.
- The stalled bill would have made the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) the national supervisor for crypto under the EUs MiCA rules, but Poland remains an outlier without such a watchdog.
- The fight over regulation is unfolding alongside a widening fraud and money?laundering probe into the defunct exchange Zondacrypto, which is driving political pressure for tighter oversight.
Deep Dive
1. Third Failed Override Vote
On 4 September, Polands lower house, the Sejm, voted 241198 with three abstentions to overturn Nawrockis veto, but needed 266 votes, a three?fifths majority of the 442 lawmakers present. This was the third time the president has vetoed essentially the same crypto bill, with earlier vetoes in December 2025 and February 2026, and previous override attempts also falling short.
Nawrocki argues the bill overregulates crypto, warning that heavy compliance costs and broad powers such as website blocking could push Polish firms to relocate abroad. He proposed an alternative, narrower bill focused on fraud safeguards, but parliament has not adopted his version.
2. MiCA Framework Stalled
The vetoed legislation was meant to implement the EUs Markets in Crypto?Assets Regulation (MiCA) in Poland by designating KNF as the national crypto supervisor and setting licensing, reporting and enforcement rules. Other EU states have already named their regulators and issued hundreds of MiCA?style licenses, but KNF has publicly confirmed that Poland still lacks an authority responsible for supervising the cryptoasset market.
This leaves local exchanges and service providers in an awkward position: MiCA applies at the EU level, yet their home jurisdiction has no clear licensing pathway or lead regulator. Banks and payment partners may treat this as added risk, potentially limiting access to fiat rails or delaying new products.
Until Warsaw passes a revised bill that both parliament and the president can accept, Polish?based crypto firms face regulatory limbo, and new entrants may prefer EU countries with clearer MiCA implementation.
3. Zondacrypto Scandal And Next Steps
The political battle is intertwined with a major scandal around Zondacrypto, a now?defunct exchange whose Estonian operator was recently declared bankrupt, with losses estimated at roughly 350 million Polish zlotys (about 95 million dollars). Prosecutors are probing suspected fraud and money laundering and have merged the case with an investigation into the disappearance of BitBay founder Sylwester Suszek.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk has used witness testimony from the Zondacrypto probe, including alleged 2 million zloty payment arrangements linked to former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, to argue for stronger crypto oversight. However, Nawrocki denies any connection to the exchange and continues to resist the current bill design. Analysts see a compromise, revised bill as the most plausible path forward.
Conclusion
Polands failure to override the latest crypto veto keeps its digital asset sector in a regulatory gap just as MiCA takes hold across the EU. For crypto users and businesses, the key watchpoints are whether lawmakers can craft a version of the bill that addresses presidential concerns and how the Zondacrypto investigation shapes public and political appetite for stricter rules.
