TLDR
Major Wall Street firms are publicly backing the US Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, a sweeping bill to define federal rules for cryptocurrencies.
- BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Fidelity, Charles Schwab and Franklin Templeton support the CLARITY Act, representing over $30 trillion in traditional assets.
- The bill would split crypto oversight between the SEC and CFTC, add disclosure and registration rules, and strengthen antimoney laundering and sanctions powers.
- Passage is far from assured, with Senate ethics and consumer protection disputes keeping probabilistic estimates around 30 to 40 percent and making the next few weeks crucial.
Deep Dive
1. Who Is Backing It
A coalition of major asset managers and brokers, including BlackRock, Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Charles Schwab, Franklin Templeton and Grayscale, has endorsed the CLARITY Act, covering over 30 trillion dollars in assets.
BlackRocks Samara Cohen describes the bill as an important step toward a digital asset framework that supports innovation while preserving transparency and investor protection, while Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon says it would create a level playing field for market structure.
Support is not unanimous: JPMorgans Jamie Dimon has criticized provisions that let crypto platforms offer yield on stablecoins, reflecting tension between deposit?funded banks and firms that see stablecoins as a new product line.
2. What The Bill Would Do
The Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) is a market?structure and illicit?finance bill. It would divide responsibility so that decentralized digital commodities fall under the CFTC, while fundraising and investment contracts stay under the SEC with tailored capital raising limits.
It adds registration standards, issuer and platform disclosure obligations, customer?property protections in bankruptcies, and extends Bank Secrecy Act and antimoney laundering rules to more crypto businesses and some DeFi activity. Senator Cynthia Lummis highlights specific tools to help Treasury and exchanges freeze suspicious flows tied to groups like North Koreas Lazarus Group, which has stolen billions in crypto.
New ethics language would restrict senior officials from issuing or sponsoring digital assets for profit while in office, though some Democrats argue the protections are still too weak.
If enacted, core tokens and exchanges could operate under clearer federal rules, making it easier for institutions to offer custody, trading and tokenization without relying on ad hoc enforcement guidance.
3. Politics, Odds And What To Watch
Despite passing the House and clearing key Senate committees, the bill still needs 60 Senate votes, meaning at least several Democrats must join Republicans before an August recess deadline or an extended session.
Seven Senate Democrats have publicly said the current draft falls short on ethics, consumer protection, DeFi oversight and illicit finance safeguards, keeping prediction?market odds of the Act becoming law in 2026 around 30 to 40 percent.
Grassroots pressure is building: advocacy group Stand With Crypto reports roughly one million constituent messages urging passage, and crypto industry leaders like Ripple and Coinbase are framing CLARITY as a bank the win compromise rather than a perfect bill.
For crypto users and builders, the next phase is watching whether Senate leaders schedule a floor vote and whether revised ethics and consumer?protection language can unlock a bipartisan 60?vote coalition.
Conclusion
Wall Streets backing for the CLARITY Act signals that large financial institutions want a predictable US framework for digital assets, not a return to pure enforcement?driven regulation.
The bill could make it easier for major banks, brokers and asset managers to expand crypto, tokenization and stablecoin services, but that outcome depends on resolving contentious ethics and investor?protection debates in the Senate.
Until that is settled, the Act remains a potential catalyst rather than a done deal, and markets will treat legislative headlines as an important driver of long?term regulatory risk rather than an immediate trading signal.
