Which funds drove SOL ETF inflows?

TLDR

Bitwise and Fidelity drove the bulk of recent SOL ETF inflows.

1. Bitwise Solana Spot ETF (BSOL) led with about $65.11 million in weekly net inflows for Dec 15, per SoSoValue data in a market recap. details
2. Fidelity SOL ETF (FSOL) added $3.49 million on Dec 5, illustrating consistent positive flow alongside Bitwise that week. day breakdown
3. The SOL ETF complex has posted six straight weeks of net inflows, signaling ongoing institutional demand. trend

Deep Dive

1. Bitwise Led

Bitwises BSOL was the primary driver of SOL ETF inflows last week.

1. Weekly flows for Dec 15 show BSOL at about $65.11 million in net inflows (the report above).
2. On a single-day cut (Dec 5), BSOL contributed $12.18 million, underscoring its leadership among SOL funds. single-day detail
3. Cumulative context: recent coverage notes BSOL sits at the top of the SOL ETF stack by assets, supporting its share of flows. six-week trend

2. Fidelity Supported

Fidelitys FSOL added steady positive flow alongside Bitwise.

1. FSOL booked $3.49 million on Dec 5, complementing BSOLs larger single-day print. day breakdown
2. For the same week, FSOL registered about $14.11 million in net inflows (the report above).
3. Together, BSOL and FSOL accounted for most of the weeks SOL ETF net purchases.

3. Rotation Across Issuers

Not all SOL ETFs saw inflows; rotation tempers the headline totals.

1. The 21Shares product (TSOL) posted the largest weekly net outflow near $73.91 million for Dec 15 (the report above).
2. Despite issuer-level divergence, the complex has logged six consecutive weeks of net inflows, keeping aggregate demand positive. trend
3. Daily tallies have stayed in the black on several sessions this month, such as Dec 5s $15.68 million across SOL ETFs. day snapshot

Conclusion

Bitwise (BSOL) led last weeks SOL ETF buying, with Fidelity (FSOL) adding support, while some peers (like 21Shares) faced redemptions. The net effect remains constructive, as consecutive weekly inflows suggest sustained institutional interest despite issuer?level rotation.