TLDR
Krakens parent company, Payward, has applied for a US national trust bank charter to offer federally regulated digital asset custody.
- Payward filed with the OCC to create Payward National Trust Company, a federally supervised digital asset trust bank focused on custody and fiduciary services.
- If approved, Krakens group could act as a qualified custodian and serve institutional clients across all 50 US states without separate state-by-state trust licenses.
- Approval is not guaranteed and will take time; watch the OCC review, competing custody offerings, and how US market-structure legislation evolves in parallel.
Deep Dive
1. What Payward Is Actually Doing
According to recent reports, Payward has submitted an application to the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to form Payward National Trust Company, a federally regulated trust bank focused on digital asset custody and related fiduciary services for institutions and individuals who require bank-level oversight for crypto holdings. This move builds on Paywards existing footprint via Kraken Financial, its Wyoming Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) that already has a Federal Reserve master account, giving the group experience operating inside US banking frameworks.
A national trust charter would not make Payward a full commercial bank, but it would place its trust entity under OCC supervision, with capital, compliance, and risk standards similar to other federally regulated trust banks.
Payward is trying to move part of Krakens infrastructure into the same regulatory perimeter as traditional US trust banks, especially for custody.
2. Why This Matters For Crypto Users And Institutions
Many large allocators (pension funds, endowments, RIAs, some corporates) can only use qualified custodians recognized under US law. A successful OCC charter would position Paywards trust entity as such a custodian, potentially unlocking new institutional flows into digital assets via the Kraken ecosystem.
The charter would also let Payward serve custody clients nationally without seeking separate trust or money services licenses in each state, which simplifies scaling regulated services and could narrow the perceived regulatory gap versus US-based competitors that already emphasize compliance.
If the charter is granted, Krakens group could become a more acceptable counterparty for conservative institutions that currently avoid offshore or lightly regulated custodians.
3. What To Watch Next
OCC charter reviews are slow and discretionary: the application appears on the OCCs digital asset licensing list with no firm decision timeline, and filing alone does not guarantee approval.
Key watchpoints are:
- Any OCC public notice or conditional approval, which could include limits on activities or capital requirements.
- How this trust entity is positioned alongside Kraken Financial and existing exchange operations, especially segregation of custody from trading.
- Broader US regulatory developments, including crypto market-structure legislation and SEC/CFTC coordination, which will shape how valuable a national trust charter ultimately is.
The filing signals a push toward more regulated, bank-style crypto infrastructure, but the practical impact depends on regulators final conditions and whether institutional clients actually migrate assets into the new trust structure.
Conclusion
Paywards bid for a US national trust charter marks another step in pulling major crypto exchanges closer to the core of the US banking and custody system. If regulators approve and the trust wins institutional business, Krakens group could emerge as a more central player in compliant, US-based digital asset custody. Until then, the move is a strategic positioning signal rather than an immediate change in how most users interact with the platform.
CoinsKid.Com